Week
4 Discussion 1
“Affirmative
Action and the Law” Please respond to the following:
•Analyze
the Bakke and the University of Michigan rulings and discuss two implications
these court rulings have on you as the personnel manager of your agency.
•Debate
It: Take a position for or against the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 1986 on
the use of affirmative action in hiring, promotion, and layoffs for your
agency. Provide at two reasons and examples to support your position.
Class,
use this format to respond to this Discussion:
Note
that this response will require a total of seven (5) items.
Analyze
the Bakke and the University of Michigan rulings and discuss two implications
these court rulings have on you as the personnel manager of your agency.
at two reasons and examples to support your position.
Week
4 Discussion 2
“Ethics
Management and Training” Please respond to the following:
•From
the e-Activity, analyze at least two issues or current events found in the news
items on the Website. Discuss reasons and consequences of the actions
described. Recommend two ways you will address the issue(s) in your agency.
•Propose
a strategy to implement an ethics management and training program for current
and newly hired employees in your agency. Within your strategy, propose a plan
that includes a minimum of three key elements to be included for employees and
a plan for management.
Use
this format to respond to this Discussion:
Note
that this response will require a total of Nine (9) items.
From
the e-Activity, analyze at least two issues or current events found in the news
items on the Website.
two ways you will address the issue(s) in your agency.
